Book Review: A Study In Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle (Sherlock Holmes #1)
A Study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle is the first novel by the author in which he introduces the English detective Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson. First published in 1887 and strange as it may seem now, this Sherlock Holmes mystery didn’t receive much notice from the public. Read the book summary, publication history, genre, favourite book quotes and book review of A Study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle in this post below.
About A Study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle:
No. of Pages: 123
Publication Date: 1887
Genre: Mystery, Crime Fiction, Classic, Detective Fiction, Thriller, Historical Fiction
Series: Sherlock Holmes #1
Can be read as a standalone? YES
Age group: 12 years and above
Buy From: AMAZON
Also Read the last Sherlock Holmes’ Novel
A Study In Scarlet By Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Book Review:
A Study in Scarlet is the first novel by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in which he introduces the English detective Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson. It was first published in 1887 and strange as it may seem now didn’t receive much notice from the public.
The novel is one of only four novels written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle featuring the great English detective and marks the beginning of the famous “Sherlock Holmes era”.
This novel is divided into two parts with the first part dealing prominently with the legendary meeting of Sherlock and Dr. Watson, and the introduction of the other characters as well as the murder mystery.
Favourite Book Quote from A Study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle:
To a great mind, nothing is little,’ remarked Holmes, sententiously.”
A study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle quote
The story begins in 1881, where Dr. Watson runs into an old friend, Stamford. Due to a shoulder injury sustained in the Anglo-Afghan War, he was forced to retire and is now looking for a place to live in London. Stamford mentions that an acquaintance of his, one Sherlock Holmes, is looking for someone to split the rent in “some nice rooms”, but cautions about Holmes’ eccentricities. Watson agrees to meet Holmes and so the platform is set for the legendary meeting between Watson and Sherlock Holmes, thus marking the beginning of one of the most illustrious partnerships of all time.
I was intrigued by Sherlock Holmes as was Watson in the book. And I feel here Conan Doyle succeeded in generating interest of the reader in solving the mystery of Sherlock Holmes who is portrayed as an enigma by Watson in his narrations. Just like Watson, I felt the need to prepare a list of all things I knew about Holmes and thus coming close to knowing him.
Dr. Watson’s summary list of Sherlock Holmes’s strengths and weaknesses from A Study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle:
Dr. Watson’s summary list of Sherlock Holmes’s strengths and weaknesses:
1) Knowledge of Literature: Nil.
2) Knowledge of Philosophy: Nil.
3) Knowledge of Astronomy: Nil.
4) Knowledge of Politics: Feeble.
Knowledge of Botany: Variable. Well up in belladonna, opium, and poisons generally. Knows nothing of practical gardening.
Knowledge of Geology: Practical but limited. Tells at a glance different soils from each other. After walks has shown me splashes upon his trousers, and told me by their colour and consistence in what part of London he had received them.
1) Knowledge of Chemistry: Profound.
2) Knowledge of Anatomy: Accurate but unsystematic.
3) Knowledge of Sensational Literature: Immense. He appears to know every detail of every horror perpetrated in the century.
Plays the violin well.
Is an expert singlestick player, boxer, and swordsman.
Has a good practical knowledge of British law.”
A study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle quote
Just as I was busy deciding what it was that Sherlock Holmes did…
I was suddenly given an insight into his occupation when he tells Watson that he is a consulting detective and asks him to join in a new mystery that has come his way. The mystery is that of a dead body found in an abandoned rural manor. Even the police have no leads and the murder is utterly baffling with only the word “Rache” found written on the wall in blood and a ring found near the body. Blood has been found in the room but there is no mark on the body. They also learn from documents found on his person that he was in London with a friend, Joseph Stangerson. I felt the murder mystery very intriguing which left me speculating till the end.
The second part takes us back in time to the year 1847 in Utah where we get to know the murderer as a brave and passionate man who is passionately in love with the beautiful Lucy. They are engaged to be married but events lead to Lucy’s death and he’s left an angry and vengeful man who vows revenge on all responsible.
Things I liked:
The novel duly fulfills its part as a platform to introduce the main characters like Sherlock Holmes, Dr. Watson, Lestrade for the future Sherlock Holmes stories/novels.
Doyle’s writing is crisp and is easy to read given that it is now more than a century old book.
There are wit and humor as well as compassion in his writing. The dialogues are memorable and remain in our memory long after we have finished reading the book. Second part of the book especially appeals to the sympathetic side of the reader where I ended up feeling sad and betrayed by the unhappy ending to the story of the murderer. Doyle is successful in bringing out the analytic abilities of Sherlock Holmes and also in confirming the fact that though he is a genius in his line of detective work, he is totally ignorant in other aspects of life.
Favourite Quote from A Study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle:
In the words of Dr. Watson,
His ignorance was as remarkable as his knowledge. Of contemporary literature, philosophy, and politics he appeared to know nothing.”
A study in scarlet by arthur conan doyle quote
Conclusion:
The plot is very challenging and left me speculating till the end but still at certain parts I felt a little confused regarding the flow of things like I had missed something and had to reread certain parts again but then it might be the aim of Doyle to keep the reader a bit confused as I was reading the reminiscences of Dr. Watson and he was supposed to be left in the dark until Holmes explained all to him. However, in the end, all is made clear and his reasoning in solving the mystery, explained by Holmes to Dr. Watson.
I rate A Study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle 4 stars out of 5 simply because I feel that the story could have been portrayed more interestingly but nonetheless the book is thoroughly enjoyable, a must-read, and also worth any number of re-reads.
Buy From:
You will also love reading:
- Book Review: The Adventure of the Speckled Band by Arthur Conan Doyle (Sherlock Holmes Short Story)
- ARC Book Review: Sherlock Holmes and the Beast of the Stapletons by James Lovegrove
- Book Review: The Hound of the Baskervilles by Arthur Conan Doyle (Sherlock Holmes #5)
- The Menagerie and other Byomkesh Bakshi stories by Saradindu Bandyopadhyay Review
This post contains affiliate links. Any purchases you make using these links earn me a small commission without costing you anything. So, reward my efforts and help me in the upkeep costs of this blog. Read more here. Please shop using these links. Thanks!
Share this post on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest. Use hashtags #BookReviewByNjkinny , #NjkinnyRecommends and #NjkinnysBlog
I had read this one a long time ago, good to be reminded of it. Afterwards, reading other Holmes stories I felt that his ignorance as Watson felt in their first meeting was not true, Holmes knew all about everything, it was impossible he could be who he was without knowing philosophy or politics…
I am glad you love Holmes..I am a die hard fan of Sherlock Holmes and have read all his books just too many times to count!! 😀
I think Holmes knew about politics and philosophy..What he claimed ignorance of was mundane stuff like human relationships, general knowledge ideas like his comment on knowing about the solar system where he said that it hardly mattered to him if earth revolved around the sun or the sun around the earth as long as it didn't help him in catching criminals.. 😛 😀
So I guess in someways he was ignorant of common things and dangerously knowledgeable in areas relatively less known to the common man!! 🙂
Great review! I indeed did find this book interesting even though the flow was a bit off for me. I do want to continue and read more of Holmes and Watson. 🙂